כל חזקה שאין עמה טענה. אינה חזקה. כיצד אמר לו מה אתה עושה בתוך שלי. והוא אמר לו שלא אמר לי אדם דבר מעולם. אינה חזקה. שמכרת לי. שנתת לי במתנה. אביך מכרה לי. אביך נתנה לי במתנה. הרי זו חזקה. והבא משום ירושה. אינו צריך טענה. האומנין והשותפים והאריסין והאפוטרופין אין להם חזקה. אין לאיש חזקה בנכסי אשתו. ולא לאשה חזקה בנכסי בעלה. ולא לאב בנכסי הבן. ולא לבן בנכסי האב. במה דברים אמורים במחזיק. אבל בנותן מתנה. והאחין שחלקו. והמחזיק בנכסי הגר. נעל וגדר. ופרץ. כל שהוא. הרי זו חזקה:
An act of possession without which there is no claim [on the ownership of the property] is not valid possession [to establish ownership]. How is this so? If he said to him: “What are you doing on my property? And the other answered: “No one ever said anything to me”, this is not valid possession [to establish ownership]. [If he said to him]: “You sold it to me”, “You gave it to me as a gift”, “Your father sold it to me”, “Your father gave it to me as a gift”, this is valid possession [to establish ownership]. He who holds possession [for three years] due to inheritance [from the previous owner], does not need to make a claim. Craftsmen, partners, sharecroppers and guardians cannot establish ownership through possession. A man cannot establish ownership through possession of his wife’s property, nor may a wife establish ownership through possession of her husband’s property, nor a father of his son’s property, nor a son of his father’s property. When is this so [that one needs three years to establish ownership]? When the person attempts to acquire the land through possession. But, when the property was given as a gift, or when brothers shared a piece of their inheritance, or when one claimed title by possession to the property of a convert [who died without inheritors], then if the claimant has shut in, walled up or broken down anything, this counts as securing ownership through possession.
Comments
Select a line on the left to view commentary.
Help support Theologa. Click to donate now!